Monday Morning Outlook: A VIX Peak and a Market Bottom? Not Quite

What do the CBOE Market Volatility Index (VIX) and the S&P 500 Index's (SPX) historical volatility say about market conditions?

by Todd Salamone 10/6/2008 7:00 AM


Today's in-depth look at the week ahead begins with a recap of last week's rising fears of a consumer-led recession despite passage of the $700-billion bailout package. Next, Schaeffer's Senior Vice President of Research Todd Salamone examines the relationship between the CBOE Market Volatility Index (VIX) and the S&P 500 Index's (SPX) historical volatility. Joe Sunderman, Vice President of Financial Market Analytics, examines the 5-year swap rate as it pertains to the 5-year Treasury bond yield. Finally, we wrap up with a look at some key economic and earnings reports slated for release this week.

Recap of the Previous Week: Fears of a Consumer-Led Recession Trump Passage of Wall Street Bailout
By Joseph Hargett, Senior Equities Analyst

Where to start? The week began with the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) logging its largest ever single-day drop, as the Dow plunged 777.68 points on Monday. Wachovia (WB) was seized by the U.S. government and the House of Representatives failed to pass a $700-billion bailout of the financial system, prompting a sharp sell-off in the waning hours of the session. However, hopes that the government would pass a revised version of the bill surfaced on Tuesday, leading the Dow to its third-largest, single-day gain, despite a slew of negative economic reports. The focus turned to the Fed and jobs data on Wednesday, as hopes that the Federal Open Market Committee would cut interest rates at its October meeting began to gain traction, while the ADP's employment index showed that employment in the private sector fell by 8,000 in September.

Thursday should have been a banner day for the market, as the Senate passed its version of the bailout bill and the Securities and Exchange Commission extended its short-sale ban. But durable goods orders fell during August, and a "sell on the news" mentality was gaining ground in regards to the bailout of the financial system. By Friday, the belief that a consumer-led recession was strong enough to outweigh the House of Representatives' passage of the $700-billion bailout plan. These fears were reinforced by the biggest monthly decline in U.S. jobs in more than 5 years. Nonfarm payrolls for September plunged by 159,000. News that Wells Fargo (WFC) made a surprise bid for Wachovia (WB) helped buoy equities on the day, but the Dow ultimately dropped 157 points by the close to round out the week with a loss of 7.3%. The S&P 500 Index (SPX) fell below the 1,100 level for the first time since November 2004, shedding 9.4% on the week, while the Nasdaq Composite (COMP) swallowed the steepest weekly loss, plunging 10.8%.

What the Trader is Expecting in the Coming Week: The CBOE Market Volatility Index (VIX) versus the S&P 500 Index's (SPX) Historical Volatility
By Todd Salamone, Senior Vice President of Research

To put last week's market action into perspective, it's probably best to revisit what I said in the prior week's edition of Monday Morning Outlook:

"Beyond the market-moving headlines out of Washington, we'll be keeping a close eye on the SPX's technical backdrop. For example, we've discussed the importance of the 1,200 level in previous commentaries. This round-number region has bent, but it has not broken. Traders have pushed the SPX below 1,200 during the past 2 weeks, only to find the broad-market index closing above this level by the end of the week. This level is the site of a key long-term moving average that has proven to be significant during the past several years. The 1,200 level is also home to a 50% retracement of the bear-market lows in 2002 and 2003, and the peak in late 2007. What happens in the short term could very well determine the market's long-term risk-reward situation."

Not only did the S&P 500 Index (SPX) experience a monthly close below its 80-month moving average in September, but it also closed below its 160-month moving average in Friday's trading. This long-term trendline marked a bottom for the SPX during the bear market in 2002-2003. What's disappointing is that the market sold off following both the failure of the House of Representatives to pass a bailout bill and the House's passage of a modified version of that same bill.

So, what are the implications of this longer-term technical deterioration? As Bernie Schaeffer noted in the October issue of The Option Advisor newsletter on September 25:

"So it is certainly conceivable that we can get an end-of-month close early next week below the 80-month that would place us in bear-market mode. And an even more ominous move below the 160-month is within easy striking distance in this volatile environment. There is no doubt that sentiment - both quantitative and anecdotal (just look at the doom-and-gloom covers of the business magazines and the news weeklies) - is bearish and that there is a lot of fear in the air. But it is unfortunately the case that while bearish sentiment in a bull market invariably presents a buying opportunity, in a bear market we are faced with the very difficult problem of attempting to determine whether or not bearish sentiment has reached the "blood in the streets" extreme that can give us an 'all clear' signal."

So, was there "blood on the streets" after the 777-point decline in the Dow on Monday? Some traders and investors came to this conclusion based on the CBOE Market Volatility Index's (VIX) highest close in 6 years on Monday. Certainly, one might conclude that with the VIX closing at a level that has been notorious for marking bottoms dating back to 1998, a buying opportunity was at hand. As such, were those investors who were seeking portfolio protection and speculating on further downside in the market really acting irrationally and overpaying for index put options like they usually do at market bottoms? As I alluded to in a recent commentary - and as seen in the table below - those buying puts on Monday were not overpaying for index options, as they did on the day of the market's crash in 1987 and during previous VIX spikes above 40.



Chart of CBOE Market Volatility Index (VIX) closes versus the respective 20-day historical volatility of the S&P 500 Index (SPX)

Using the data above, it appears that major peaks in the VIX occur when the implied volatility of SPX options trades is significantly above the index's actual, or historical, volatility. I'll add that when the VIX peaked at 36.47 in August 1990 during the Savings and Loan crisis, the 20-day historical volatility was at 17.22, implying that index option buyers were once again overpaying for portfolio protection. As we enter this week's trading, the VIX is at 45.14, while the SPX's 20-day historical volatility is at 57.32. Should the VIX's pattern of peaking only after trading at a significant premium to the SPX's historical volatility continue, more selling could be on the horizon. We'll closely follow this relationship between the VIX and the SPX's historical volatility in the coming days and weeks.

Meanwhile, now that President Bush has signed the $700-billion bailout bill, questions remain. Is it the right solution? When will we begin to see the impact of this bill? What's more, it is important to remember that these problems are not contained to the U.S., as France and Germany remain in disagreement about a bailout in Europe. Finally, earnings and elections are around the corner, adding to the uncertainty in the current environment. In the midst of this global storm, the focus will once again return to the Fed, as poor economic data last week amid falling commodity price raised expectations that a rate cut is on the horizon.

Despite the SPX's close below long-term moving averages, our message remains the same – stick with the stronger financial and homebuilding equities, but hedge your exposure to these sectors by going short a related exchange-traded fund or going long a related ultra-short exchange-traded fund. Furthermore, avoid large-cap technology stocks, such as Research in Motion (RIMM), Apple (AAPL), Qualcomm (QCOM), and Microsoft (MSFT), which are heavily owned by the hedge-fund community.

Finally, if options are currently not a part of your trading strategy, consider learning and utilizing them. The leverage that these vehicles provide allow you to put limited dollars at risk in the market, as you can use long-term or deep in-the-money options as a stock substitute. Moreover, you can profit from in both up and down markets. Thank goodness for these trading vehicles in times like this!

Today's Most Popular Stories




Featured Companies




Receive FREE access to Schaeffer’s
Sentiment Spring 2009
premier online options magazine!



Partner Center