Schaeffer's Daily Contrarian

"When everyone thinks alike, everyone is likely to be wrong."
~ Humphrey Neill, The Art of Contrary Thinking

The above quote has been reiterated numerous times in our publications because of its ability to succinctly capture the essence of contrarian thinking. While simple in theory, the task of capturing the prevailing sentiment can be as elusive as defining the boundaries of a cloud. The closer you get to it, the harder it is to see.(More)

 Print  My Yahoo  Add RSS

View Most Recent Contrarian Takeaways

 

Critics Are Quick to Jump on Palm's Stumble

Posted on 11/20/2009 11:53 AM

Publication: "The New York Times"
Publication title: "Is Palm's Comeback Losing Steam?"
Publication Date: 11/15/2009

KeyWords: PALM AAPL RIMM MOT 

Brief Summary:

This skeptical article notes that Palm Inc. (PALM: sentiment, chart, options) -- once a trailblazer in the smartphone field -- has recently lost ground to bigger rivals such as Apple (AAPL), Research In Motion Limited (RIMM), and Nokia (NOK). "While no one expected Palm's sales would rival the sales of iPhones or BlackBerrys -- and they have not -- developers have not rushed to write applications for the phone as they have for the iPhone and Android phones," says the author. As a result, the article explains, this David among Goliaths "could well find itself struggling as the perpetual also-ran."

However, Palm CEO Jon Rubinstein is given the opportunity to defend his company. He argues that he's not intimidated by rivals such as the Motorola (MOT) Droid, which is dependent upon software provided by Google (GOOG). "The companies that will deliver the best products are the ones that integrate the whole experience -- the hardware, the software and the services -- and aren't getting one piece from here and one piece from there and trying to bolt it all together," he asserts. Rubinstein is also optimistic about the prospects for Palm's new, low-priced Pixi, which he claims is in "the sweet spot of the market" as more and more users make the transition from traditional mobile phones to smartphones.


Contrarian Takeaway:

It seems that investors are just as skeptical of PALM's prospects as The New York Times, since the equity has backpedaled sharply from its recently tapped annual high of $18.09. The shares are now trading south of $12, and they're fighting a losing battle against resistance from their 10-day and 20-day moving averages. In fact, the equity's formerly supportive 10-week and 20-week trendlines recently completed a bearish cross, which could be a harbinger of additional downside to come.

However, it doesn't seem as though PALM is vulnerable to a large-scale unwinding of optimism, since the Times article more or less sums up the prevailing attitude toward the Pre parent. Short interest ticked up by 3.5% during the most recent reporting period, and these bearish bets now account for a lofty 38.3% of the security's float (or 5.2 times PALM's average daily trading volume). In other words, there's no shortage of traders betting against this smartphone upstart.

Analysts are also firmly entrenched in the bearish camp, with Zacks reporting 16 "hold" or "sell" ratings, compared to just four "buy" or better recommendations. With so much pessimism levied against the stock, it seems safe to assume that many of the concerns raised in this article have already been priced into PALM shares. While the equity's current price plunge suggests that it's too soon to try and bet against the herd, the swelling bearish chorus on Wall Street could indicate that the shares are very close to finding a floor.

Elizabeth Harrow (eharrow@sir-inc.com)


 Discuss this commentary (Comments: 0)  |   Email to a Friend  |  RSS Feed Add RSS Feed
 Del.icio.us   Facebook   Reddit   Newsvine   Digg!Digg  

Today's Most Popular Stories






Discussion Board

 Discuss this commentary:

Add a new discussion topic related to this commentary Discussion Board Home Page
There are currently no discussions related to this commentary.


Search Past Schaeffer's Daily Contrarian

Search by:Word or phrase to search:

 

"When everyone thinks alike, everyone is likely to be wrong."
~ Humphrey Neill,
The Art of Contrary Thinking

The above quote has been reiterated numerous times in our publications because of its ability to succinctly capture the essence of contrarian thinking. While simple in theory, the task of capturing the prevailing sentiment can be as elusive as defining the boundaries of a cloud. The closer you get to it, the harder it is to see.

Even Humphrey Neill admitted the difficulties inherent in gauging sentiment:

"I found in my own case that it took several years, as a matter of fact, before I was able to weigh 'public opinion' with sufficient accuracy to feel reasonably confident of the contrary conclusion. It takes time to form the habit of thinking contrarily…I grant you that you will have to peruse a pile of news and comments."

Regular Schaeffer's readers are well aware that we use "hard" data such as put/call ratios and short interest to gauge the sentiment of stocks, sectors, and the market as a whole. Graphs and numbers are easy to quantify and show. What is not so easy to convey is the sentiment that is gathered from poring over numerous publications and scanning various news outlets. This information is embedded in our approach and used to make trading decisions.

At Schaeffer's, we have a team of analysts who track this "anecdotal sentiment" and pull it all together for our in-house research. The amount of information available is overwhelming and it would be impossible for one individual to stay on top of it all. Noting that Neill himself acknowledged the complexity of tracking numerous publications and the need for experience, we have launched a new column, "Schaeffer's Daily Contrarian."

This daily column will post summaries of current articles and provide a short take on how we view the article in a contrarian light. Some entries will give you insight into how we read media articles and how to merge small morsels into a tasty contrarian meal. Our goal is to constantly scan various media and news outlets every trading day and present some of what we feel provides a good contrarian read. We should note that not all articles will lend themselves to a contrarian interpretation. In fact, most will not.

What This is Not

First and foremost, "Schaeffer's Daily Contrarian" is not meant as a trade recommendation. These articles and our contrarian interpretation are but a small piece of a much larger analytical puzzle. Gathering anecdotal sentiment from a variety of sources and merging this with hard data is the hallmark of contrarian analysis. Here you get a first-hand account of how to go about this in real time.

It's also important to understand that getting a contrarian read from an article is by no means a poor reflection on the publication or its writers. A negative article on a high-flying stock may site accurate facts and be extremely logical. And more importantly, it could ultimately prove to be correct. However, experience has taught us that uptrends do not end until the final capitulation where it seems that everyone has finally given up their concerns. The market has shown time and again that short-term moves are often driven purely on emotions. By monitoring the comments made by analysts in the media, we can add this to our contrarian arsenal to gauge whether the capitulation stage has finally been reached.

At Schaeffer's, we have the years of experience and the ability to "peruse the piles of news." More importantly, we are willing to share it with you every day. It's almost like having your own personal team of contrarian analysts gathering and summarizing anecdotal information. We hope "Schaeffer's Daily Contrarian" becomes a resource you value as much as we do.

(Top of Page)



Partner Center
tribal fussion